Re: ARIN email address (was cogent spamming directly from ARIN records?)

Wed Oct 4 01:55:14 UTC 2023

Heh. (:

Le 4 octobre 2023 01:23:13 UTC, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> a écrit :
>I was one of the main people behind their suspension from ARIN whois for 6 months.
>
>They have not spammed me since.
>
>They’re probably afraid of another cake.
>
>Owen
>
>
>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:18, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Give it time :)
>> 
>> -Mike
>> 
>>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 18:06, Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But I seem to have finally gotten Cogent trained not to spam this one, so I think I’ll leave it as is.
>>> 
>>> YMMV
>>> 
>>> Owen
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Oct 3, 2023, at 08:52, Bryan Fields <Bryan at bryanfields.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/2/23 11:28 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>>>>> I believe they got the contact information from ARIN
>>>> 
>>>> I'd suggest everyone use an alias unique to ARIN for your POC and/or public email.  Makes it super simple to verify where it was sourced from.
>>>> 
>>>> (and yes I've got the same spam)
>>>> -- 
>>>> Bryan Fields
>>>> 
>>>> 727-409-1194 - Voice
>>>> http://bryanfields.net
>>> 
>

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20231004/8e079ee2/attachment.html>