maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
Jon Lewis
jlewis at lewis.org
Mon Oct 2 13:03:08 UTC 2023
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG wrote:
> While I did allude to some of the complexity, my main point
>
> is that FIB compression does not allow you to install a FIB with less memory.
>
> Because you must be prepared for transients during which the FIB needs to store
>
> mostly uncompressed anyway.
>
> All it does is to increase convergence time.
In my experience, that's incorrect. FIB compression allows you to run
with full tables on devices that can no longer accommodate full
[uncompressed] tables in whatever is used to store FIB. Obviously, it
does require more RAM due to the complexities of keeping track of more
state. But RAM is typically far more easily upgraded (cheaply) than TCAM.
Even if it does increase convergence time, that's a compromise many
are willing to make if the alternative is toss your current gear and
replace it with newer gear years sooner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
More information about the NANOG
mailing list