Routed optical networks

Etienne-Victor Depasquale edepa at ieee.org
Tue May 2 18:29:11 UTC 2023


>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
> > In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
> > better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take the
> > extra router hop (or 3 or 8) versus short-cutting it with an optical
> > network because the silicon is so low-latency anyway that it hardly
> makes a
> > difference now. Putting more GBs per second on fewer strands means
> saving a
> > lot of money on infrastructure costs.
>
> This is a very convoluted way of backing into the ole packet-switched
> vs. circuit switched decision.
>

I don't follow.
While ROADMs can be thought of as circuit-switchers,
the number of concurrent clients and switching latency put ROADMs on a
different operational level than packet switchers, right?

Cheers,

Etienne

On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 4:29 PM Izaac <izaac at setec.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
> > In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
> > better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take the
> > extra router hop (or 3 or 8) versus short-cutting it with an optical
> > network because the silicon is so low-latency anyway that it hardly
> makes a
> > difference now. Putting more GBs per second on fewer strands means
> saving a
> > lot of money on infrastructure costs.
>
> This is a very convoluted way of backing into the ole packet-switched
> vs. circuit switched decision.
>
> --
> . ___ ___  .   .  ___
> .  \    /  |\  |\ \
> .  _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
>


-- 
Ing. Etienne-Victor Depasquale
Assistant Lecturer
Department of Communications & Computer Engineering
Faculty of Information & Communication Technology
University of Malta
Web. https://www.um.edu.mt/profile/etiennedepasquale
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230502/971c9801/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list