Smaller than a /24 for BGP?

Wed Jan 25 20:24:29 UTC 2023

I would suggest that this is trying to solve the wrong problem.  To me this
is pressure to migrate to v6, not alter routing rules.

Kind Regards,
Chris Haun

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:21 PM Justin Wilson (Lists) <lists at mtin.net>
wrote:

> Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller
> than a /24? I qm seeing more and more scenarios where folks need to
> participate in BGP but they do not need a full /24 of space.  Seems
> wasteful.  I know this would bloat the routing table immensely.  I know of
> several folks who could split their /24 into /25s across a few regions and
> still have plenty of IP space.
>
>
>
> Justin Wilson
> j2sw at j2sw.com
>
> —
> https://blog.j2sw.com - Podcast and Blog
> https://www.fd-ix.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20230125/8a879e6f/attachment.html>