A straightforward transition plan (was: Re: V6 still not supported)

Abraham Y. Chen aychen at avinta.com
Mon Jan 16 15:23:38 UTC 2023

Dear BZS:

1)   " ... it was more likely due to the success of CGNAT.":   Looking 
forward from this milestone marker, what would you envision as the 
possible additions to CG-NAT's characteristics and capabilities for the 
potential expansion of its services and enhancement to its performances?


Abe (2023-01-16 10:22)

On 2023-01-11 19:33, bzs at theworld.com wrote:
> On January 12, 2023 at 02:11noah at neo.co.tz  (Noah) wrote:
>   > Hi John,
>   >
>   > So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the adoption
>   > of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few
>   > countries in the world.
>   >
>   > It was also assumed that IPv6 only networks would crop all over the place as a
>   > result, providing the same interconnectivity benefits enjoyed by the IPv4
>   > internet.
>   >
>   > Out of curiosity,did the emergency of transfer markets slow IPNG adoption while
>   > creating prolonged dependence on IPv4?
> Probably ten people have said this already but it was more likely due
> to the success of CGNAT.

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

More information about the NANOG mailing list