[External] Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)

• Previous message (by thread): Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)
• Next message (by thread): Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:29 AM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG
<nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> 1. Do I really have to “de-aggregate” the address blocks, so I can do the “manual BGP load-sharing”?

Why not prepend toward the commercial ISP? Seems that should make the
path longer and less desirable.

--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331

Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering

• Previous message (by thread): Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)
• Next message (by thread): Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]