any dangers of filtering every /24 on full internet table to preserve FIB space ?

Mon Oct 10 16:10:32 UTC 2022

I like that idea. 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

Midwest-IX 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jay Hennigan" <jay at west.net> 
To: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2022 10:39:06 AM 
Subject: Re: any dangers of filtering every /24 on full internet table to preserve FIB space ? 

On 10/10/22 07:58, Edvinas Kairys wrote: 
> Hello, 
> 
> We're considering to buy some Cisco boxes - NCS-55A1-24H. That box has 
> 24x100G, but only 2.2mln route (FIB) memory entries. In a near future it 
> will be not enough - so we're thinking to deny all /24s to save the 
> memory. What do you think about that approach - I know it could provide 
> some misbehavior. But theoretically every filtered /24 could be routed 
> via smaller prefix /23 /22 /21 or etc. But of course it could be a 
> situation when denied /24 will not be covered by any smaller prefix. 
> 
> What do you think about this approach ? 

Are you multi-homed? If not you can simply take a default. 

If so, a better approach might be to apply a max AS rule and take full 
tables plus a default from both (all). Something like "bgp maxas-limit 
4" will optimize routing down to /24 but drop routes with long AS paths 
and punt to default, reducing your table size at the cost of sub-optimal 
routing to destinations that are going to take a convoluted path anyway. 

-- 
Jay Hennigan - jay at west.net 
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20221010/30f9a9b9/attachment.html>