Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above

Tue Nov 22 07:10:39 UTC 2022

Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 11/21/22 16:30, Joe Maimon wrote:
>

>
> IMNSHO, if such a proposal were to gain traction, by the time that 
> gear capable of using 240/4 as unicast were to be widely deployed, 
> IPv6-capable gear would be much more widely deployed.

Considering that is already the situation, whats your point?

>
> META: Can whoever is doing so please stop creating new time-stamped 
> subject lines for the same topic? It makes things hard to follow.
>