Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above

Tue Nov 22 00:56:13 UTC 2022

On 11/21/22 16:30, Joe Maimon wrote:

> You can hardly attempt to convince anybody that 240/4 as unicast would 
> not be the more trivial change made in any of these products natural 
> life cycle points.

One can and indeed some do attempt to do just that. The likelihood of 
these attempts actually convincing those in a position to influence 
change is what is in question.

IMNSHO, if such a proposal were to gain traction, by the time that gear 
capable of using 240/4 as unicast were to be widely deployed, 
IPv6-capable gear would be much more widely deployed.

META: Can whoever is doing so please stop creating new time-stamped 
subject lines for the same topic? It makes things hard to follow.

-- 
Jay Hennigan - jay at west.net
Network Engineering - CCIE #7880
503 897-8550 - WB6RDV