BCP38 For BGP Customers

Thu Nov 10 18:08:36 UTC 2022

On 11/8/22 10:53 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> Hi Grant,

Hi Bill, and everyone else who replied.

> Two problems here:

Thank you for taking the time to reply and help me understand the 
shortcomings of uRPF better.

I wonder if Feasible Path uRPF or Enhanced Feasible Path uRPF might help 
the situation.  However I suspect they both suffer from the FIB != RIB 
problem and associated signaling.

More things to think about.

Thank you again.

-- 
Grant. . . .
unix || die

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4017 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20221110/0c724cea/attachment.bin>