A few questions regarding about RPKI/invalids

Wed Mar 30 16:07:49 UTC 2022

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 10:35 AM Job Snijders via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
wrote:

>
> I'd reject them. Why carve out an exception merely because the
> number is 'large'? :-)
>
>
To add to this, many routes does not equal lots of traffic or even
important traffic.

If it continues to be invalid, someone didn't bother to make sure it works
everywhere.

Keep dropping them.

--
Nimrod
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220330/2130855f/attachment.html>