V6 still not supported
Mark Delany
k3f at november.emu.st
Thu Mar 24 09:19:55 UTC 2022
On 24Mar22, Greg Skinner via NANOG allegedly wrote:
> straightforward transition plan
> in-hand working transition strategy
> nor a straightforward transition
Any such "transition plan" whether "working" or "straightforward" is logically
impossible. Why anyone thinks such a mythical plan might yet be formulated some 20+ years
after deploying any of ipv6, ipv4++ or ipv6-lite is absurd.
The logic goes: we support legacy "do nothing" ipv4 deployments forever. We also expect
those same deployments to invest significant effort, cost and risk to move off their
perfectly functioning network for no self-serving benefit.
There be unicorns and denial of human nature.
Mark.
More information about the NANOG
mailing list