V6 still not supported

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 23:58:24 UTC 2022

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 5:36 PM Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:

> On 3/22/22 5:45 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

> right would have had any better chance of being adopted? My experience
> with Cisco product managers at the time is that they couldn't give a
> shit about the technical aspects of an ipng. If their silicon forwarding
> couldn't handle it, they weren't interested unless customers were
Somewhere in this thread Randy sent a link to his ivtf
I think his point there was essentially: "Hey, vendors are coin operated,
they build what people
are asking for, if they are willing to pay AND if there are enough of them
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220322/31e6a649/attachment.html>

More information about the NANOG mailing list