Making Use of 240/4 NetBlock Re: 202203151549.AYC

Sun Mar 20 18:26:55 UTC 2022

>
> I wouldn’t assume that the small number of responses indicates a lack of
> interest.  It’s possible that people haven’t commented because they’ve seen
> this topic play itself out over the years, and although they have opinions,
> they don’t feel compelled to post them there.  (Interestingly enough, some
> have posted them here.)  Another possibility is that they’re waiting until
> the draft is presented later this week before expressing their opinions.
>

There are quite a few responses. All expressed zero interest.

This is a pretty common pattern. Someone comes up with an idea, spends zero
time researching the history of the problem or previous discussions,and
submits it to the IETF. People point out that it's been
discussed before,and they aren't interested,but the submitter stamps their
feet because nobody is LISTENING to them.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 1:14 PM Greg Skinner via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
wrote:

>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2022, at 7:04 PM, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Firstly nobody uses mailing list digests as references.  Secondly anyone
> can post to the mailing list, you just need to subscribe.  If you read the
> thread you can see there is no interest in this.
> >
> >
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/iZnR1Dkomu4D8AfHTI2xR_npJ8Y/
> >
>
> I wouldn’t assume that the small number of responses indicates a lack of
> interest.  It’s possible that people haven’t commented because they’ve seen
> this topic play itself out over the years, and although they have opinions,
> they don’t feel compelled to post them there.  (Interestingly enough, some
> have posted them here.)  Another possibility is that they’re waiting until
> the draft is presented later this week before expressing their opinions.
>
> —gregbo
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220320/3928cf9a/attachment.html>