IPv6 "bloat"

Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe lb at 6by7.net
Sun Mar 20 14:17:41 UTC 2022


It seems sketchy to me to even retain client MAC information, no? Genuine question.

Didn’t we go to a distinct unique identifier system for this very reason?

Am I in the 1990s here or?

We’re just handing out addresses to UEs and things seem to work fine.  For me personally, I find the notation of v6 to be very unasthetic, so I tend to just conceal it from myself now.

-LB

Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC 
CEO 
ben at 6by7.net
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.”
ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks>

FCC License KJ6FJJ




> On Mar 19, 2022, at 3:56 PM, Matt Hoppes <mattlists at rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/19/22 6:50 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> On 3/19/22 3:47 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> It has "features" which are at a minimum problematic and at a maximum show stoppers for network operators.
>>> 
>>> IPv6 seems like it was designed to be a private network communication stack, and how an ISP would use and distribute it was a second though.
>> What might those be? And it doesn't seem to be a show stopper for a lot of very large carriers.
> 
> Primarily the ability to end-to-end authenticate end devices.   The primary and largest glaring issue is that DHCPv6 from the client does not include the MAC address, it includes the (I believe) UUID.
> 
> We have to sniff the packets to figure out the MAC so that we can authenticate the client and/or assign an IP address to the client properly.
> 
> It depends how you're managing the network.  If you're running PPPoE you can encapsulate in that.   But PPPoE is very 1990 and has its own set of problems.  For those running encapsulated traffic, authentication to the modem MAC via DHCP that becomes broken.  And thus far, I have not seen a solution offered to it.
> 
> 
> Secondly - and less importantly to deployment, IPv6 also provides a layer of problematic tracking for advertisers.  Where as before many devices were behind a PAT, now every device has a unique ID -- probably for the life of the device. Marketers can now pinpoint down not just to an IP address that identifies a single NAT interface, but each individual device.  This is problematic from a data collection standpoint.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220320/d82d8e60/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list