V6 still not supported
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Fri Mar 18 23:31:24 UTC 2022
On 3/18/22 2:32 PM, surfer at mauigateway.com wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 13:47:00 -0700, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:
>
> I'd really like to understand what the requirements that are specific to
> v6 are that make it so much harder or bloated. Not product availability,
> but actual things that make it difficult to deploy.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It's all in the nanog archives. Just the amount of grumping by
> network operators to finally get DHCPv6 was pretty tremendous.
> Basically, folks were shouting "we want it whether you think we need
> it or not!" Of course, that's just the start. This thread itself has
> a lot of the iceberg tops.
>
That was almost 20 years ago. Anything a little more contemporary? I
know about Android's aversion to DHCPv6, but that is not a standards
problem it's a vendor being a PITA.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220318/906a95c0/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list