Cogent cutting links to Russia?

Michael Thomas mike at
Fri Mar 4 22:07:36 UTC 2022

On 3/4/22 2:03 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:55 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan at> 
> wrote:
>     I would argue they don't have much of a choice:
>     "The economic sanctions put in place as a result of the invasion
>     and the increasingly uncertain security situation make it
>     impossible for Cogent to continue to provide you with service."
>     I would expect to see others follow suit  if that is the case.
> That's an interesting slope to slide along...
> I fully understand ISPs disconnecting customers for non-payment; we've
> all had to do that at one point or another in our careers, I'm sure.
> However, that's generally done *after* the customer has demonstrated
> an inability or unwillingness to pay their bills.
> This doesn't seem to indicate that any existing invoices have gone
> unpaid past their due date, but simply that there is *concern* that a
> future bill might go unpaid due to the economic sanctions.
> I'm not sure that's a good precedent for a service provider to create;
> "we may terminate your service at any point if we suspect that at an
> unspecified time in the future, you may become unable to pay future
> invoices."
> Shades of Minority Report.  We'll imprison you today for a crime we
> suspect you will commit in the future.   ^_^;
> If and when bills go unpaid, I fully support turning off customers.
> I worry about the precedent of disconnecting based on suspicions
> of what might happen in the future, however.
With sanctions, isn't there a possibility that they literally *can't* 
get paid? That is, they are running on free service as of now?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list