Congrats to AS701

Mon Jun 13 15:18:34 UTC 2022

Also, it doesn't seem to be enabled on ports that have static ipv4

but progress is progress. we'll take it.

Nimrod

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:17 AM Matthew Huff <mhuff at ox.com> wrote:

> Still no IPv6 in Westchester County, NY ☹
>
>
>
> Great sign though, maybe NY will get it eventually
>
>
>
> *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces+mhuff=ox.com at nanog.org> * On Behalf Of *Joe
> Loiacono
> *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2022 10:55 AM
> *To:* nanog at nanog.org
> *Subject:* Re: Congrats to AS701
>
>
>
> FiOS from Maryland (anonymized):
>
> enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.1.164  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
>         inet6 fe80::b104:8f4d:e5b2:e13b  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:a9b1:5f59:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64
> scopeid 0x0<global>
>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:24a8:7b31:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64
> scopeid 0x0<global>
>         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:e1b6:8b83:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64
> scopeid 0x0<global>
>         ether d0:67:e5:23:ec:fe  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>         RX packets 2518066  bytes 1448982813 (1.4 GB)
>         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
>         TX packets 2157395  bytes 260073952 (260.0 MB)
>         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>
> a at b:~$ ping 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a
> PING 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a(2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a) 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=17.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=20.4 ms
> 64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=23.4 ms
> ^C
> --- 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.618/21.351/23.983/2.555 ms
>
>
>
> On 6/12/2022 1:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Darrel Lewis (darlewis) <
> darlewis at cisco.com> wrote:
>
> I, for one, am having a hard time finding the proper words to express the
> joy that I am feeling at this momentous moment!
>
>
>
>
>
> It's quite amazing, I think... that it's taken so long to get to
> deployment you can actually see on the fios plant :)
>
> I'd note I can't see the below on my homestead, but I can at a relative's
> (where the ifconfig data is from).
>
> I also can't tell if the upstream will PD a block to the downstream... and
> the VZ CPE is 'not something I want to fiddle with',
>
> because everytime I have tried at my house I've just taken it out behind
> the woodshed with a maul... and replaced it with
>
> something I CAN configure successfully. (plus.. don't want that TR 069 in
> my home...)
>
>
>
> -chris
>
>
>
> -Darrel
>
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2022, at 7:05 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
>
>
>
> Looks like FIOS customers may be getting ipv6 deployed toward them,
> finally:
>
> ifconfig snippet from local machine:
>         inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:73d2:6bcc:1e6b:43a1  prefixlen 64
>  scopeid 0x0<global>
>         inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:e87:bf36:b6cb:6ce1  prefixlen 64
>  scopeid 0x0<global>
>
>
>
> ping attempt:
>
>   64 bytes from bh-in-f106.1e100.net (2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a): icmp_seq=1
> ttl=59 time=8.71 ms
>
>
>
> 8ms from mclean, va to ashburn, va isn't wondrous, but at least it's ipv6
> (and marginally faster than ipv4)
>
>
>
> Congrats to the 701 folk for deploying more widely!
>
>   (note: I don't know exactly when this started, nor how wide it really
> is, but progress here is welcomed by myself at least :) )
>
> -chris
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220613/dd9af7bf/attachment.html>