Congrats to AS701

Mon Jun 13 14:55:02 UTC 2022

FiOS from Maryland (anonymized):

enp3s0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
         inet 192.168.1.164  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
         inet6 fe80::b104:8f4d:e5b2:e13b  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:a9b1:5f59:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  
scopeid 0x0<global>
         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:24a8:7b31:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  
scopeid 0x0<global>
         inet6 2600:4040:b27f:cb00:e1b6:8b83:xxxx:xxxx  prefixlen 64  
scopeid 0x0<global>
         ether d0:67:e5:23:ec:fe  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
         RX packets 2518066  bytes 1448982813 (1.4 GB)
         RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
         TX packets 2157395  bytes 260073952 (260.0 MB)
         TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

a at b:~$ ping 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a
PING 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a(2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=24.0 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=17.6 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=20.4 ms
64 bytes from 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=23.4 ms
^C
--- 2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.618/21.351/23.983/2.555 ms

On 6/12/2022 1:55 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:03 PM Darrel Lewis (darlewis) 
> <darlewis at cisco.com> wrote:
>
>     I, for one, am having a hard time finding the proper words to
>     express the joy that I am feeling at this momentous moment!
>
>
> It's quite amazing, I think... that it's taken so long to get to 
> deployment you can actually see on the fios plant :)
> I'd note I can't see the below on my homestead, but I can at a 
> relative's (where the ifconfig data is from).
>
> I also can't tell if the upstream will PD a block to the downstream... 
> and the VZ CPE is 'not something I want to fiddle with',
> because everytime I have tried at my house I've just taken it out 
> behind the woodshed with a maul... and replaced it with
> something I CAN configure successfully. (plus.. don't want that TR 069 
> in my home...)
>
> -chris
>
>     -Darrel
>
>>     On Jun 11, 2022, at 7:05 PM, Christopher Morrow
>>     <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>
>>     Looks like FIOS customers may be getting ipv6 deployed toward
>>     them, finally:
>>
>>     ifconfig snippet from local machine:
>>             inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:73d2:6bcc:1e6b:43a1  prefixlen
>>     64  scopeid 0x0<global>
>>             inet6 2600:4040:2001:2200:e87:bf36:b6cb:6ce1  prefixlen
>>     64  scopeid 0x0<global>
>>
>>     ping attempt:
>>       64 bytes from bh-in-f106.1e100.net
>>     <http://bh-in-f106.1e100.net> (2607:f8b0:4004:c09::6a):
>>     icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=8.71 ms
>>
>>     8ms from mclean, va to ashburn, va isn't wondrous, but at least
>>     it's ipv6 (and marginally faster than ipv4)
>>
>>     Congrats to the 701 folk for deploying more widely!
>>       (note: I don't know exactly when this started, nor how wide it
>>     really is, but progress here is welcomed by myself at least :) )
>>     -chris
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220613/36ff57b9/attachment.html>