Does anybody know if part of this enforcement involves STIR/SHAKEN?
sean at donelan.com
Fri Jul 22 23:00:45 UTC 2022
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Basically the jist that it's fake auto warranty fraud calls. Or is this just
> requiring providers to do the forensics whichever way to enforce this?
As always speak with your corporate attorney or a licensed attorney
familar with communications law.
The FCC order is under the TRACED Act of 2019. The order doesn't depend on
STIR/SHAKEN. The Traceback Consortium and providers use a variety of
methods to identify the calls.
"By this Order, the Bureau directs all U.S.-based voice service providers
to investigate promptly the apparently illegal robocall traffic
identified in section II.A. above. We further direct all voice service
providers that locate any of the apparently illegal robocall traffic
described in this Order to take immediate steps to effectively mitigate
and prevent further transmission of the apparently unlawful calls."
"If the voice service provider concludes that the identified traffic was
not illegal, the report must include an explanation as to why the provider
has reasonably concluded that the identified calls were not illegal and
what steps the voice service provider took to reach that conclusion."
The order is available
More information about the NANOG