LEC copper removal from commercial properties

L F liz.fazekas at gmail.com
Thu Feb 17 02:27:14 UTC 2022


>
> Watching the Spot Price....
>
> AIP sounds Suspicious
>
> In the Ol’ days CO’s would be broken into
> And the Cu stolen... even the Telco cutoffs disappeared!
>
> Prices are exponentially Higher now!
>
>
> Hmmmm....
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:17 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Looks like its abandon in place "AIP" from the agreement.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:03 PM L F <liz.fazekas at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Who becomes the Beneficial Owner of the Copper once Removed?
>>>
>>>
>>> Just Curious.
>>>
>>>
>>> LF
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:01 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> NANOG'ers;
>>>>
>>>> At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices
>>>> that 'copper  lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with
>>>> fiber. The property owner, not the network operators (or users of unbundled
>>>> elements if that's even still a thing) are being presented with an
>>>> agreement that acknowledges the removal, authorizes the fiber installation
>>>> and provides for a minor oversight of the design. It suggests that no costs
>>>> are involved in terms of hosting equipment. No power reimbursement. No rent
>>>> for spaces used.
>>>>
>>>> There is an ominous paragraph in the letter that says if the property
>>>> owner doesn't comply that tenants will lose all services including elevator
>>>> phones, alarms, voice, internet and any copper/ds0 originated services.
>>>> They didn't say 911, but that would go without saying.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone heard of this?
>>>> What FCC rule requires this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for any insights.
>>>>
>>>> Warm regards,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>> --
>>>   Liz *******
>>> 416.660.5456
>>>
>> --
>   Liz *******
> 416.660.5456
>
-- 
  Liz *******
416.660.5456
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220216/ccf6d744/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list