Authoritative Resources for Public DNS Pinging
Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe
lb at 6by7.net
Wed Feb 9 01:15:32 UTC 2022
Orly? 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10937 ttl=112 time=44.408 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10938 ttl=112 time=43.480 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10939 ttl=112 time=57.839 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10940 ttl=112 time=38.816 ms
-LB
Ms. Lady Benjamin PD Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE
6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC
CEO
ben at 6by7.net <mailto:ben at 6by7.net>
"The only fully end-to-end encrypted global telecommunications company in the world.”
ANNOUNCING: 6x7 GLOBAL MARITIME <https://alexmhoulton.wixsite.com/6x7networks>
FCC License KJ6FJJ
> On Feb 8, 2022, at 12:39 PM, Lukas Tribus <lukas at ltri.eu <mailto:lukas at ltri.eu>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 18:56, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net <mailto:nanog at ics-il.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, pinging public DNS servers is bad.
>>
>> Googling didn't help me find anything.
>>
>> Are there any authoritative resources from said organizations saying you shouldn't use their servers for your persistent ping destinations?
>
> This was just posted by Matthew Walster on the outages list (since
> 8.8.8.8 stopped responding to ICMP somewhere):
>
> https://peering.google.com/#/learn-more/faq <https://peering.google.com/#/learn-more/faq>
>
>
> Lukas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220208/31db8480/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list