Amazon peering revisited

Fri Feb 4 22:27:37 UTC 2022

"For a company like Amazon..." 

True, but also, they're at a size where staffing and operating peering operations generously has a negligible impact on the fiscal situation of the company (or even department). 

----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Kevin Burke" <kburke at burlingtontelecom.com> 
To: "Lincoln Dale" <ltd at interlink.com.au>, "Kelly Littlepage" <kelly at onechronos.com> 
Cc: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 3:25:53 PM 
Subject: RE: Amazon peering revisited 

Have gotten into the habit of making annual peering requests to Amazon asking turn up a session on a shared IXP peering. Once was able to get a peering session turned up, no traffic was ever shifted onto it before we moved out of that carrier hotel a year or so later. The amazon peering email box does have humans surfing it. 

Over the years a number of network operators have mentioned getting little response from Amazon about peering requests. 

For a company like Amazon they have little reason to do peering with small scale operators. They already peer with the tier 1’s and assume I will do what I need to balance my bits. The fancy algorithms they use to balance traffic around does allow them to operate a decent network with fewer staff and less links to the small ISPs. Just a network operator here, trying to get my bytes across the wire. 

Enjoy your weekend! 

Kevin Burke 
802-540-0979 
Burlington Telecom 
200 Church St, Burlington, VT 

From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+kburke=burlingtontelecom.com at nanog.org> On Behalf Of Lincoln Dale 
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 12:20 PM 
To: Kelly Littlepage <kelly at onechronos.com> 
Cc: nanog at nanog.org 
Subject: Re: Amazon peering revisited 

WARNING!! This message originated from an External Source . Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. 

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 8:22 AM Kelly Littlepage via NANOG < nanog at nanog.org > wrote: 

Hi all, a nanog thread started on November 23, 2018 discussed the challenges of getting Amazon peering sessions turned up. Has anyone had luck since/does anyone have a contact they could refer me to — off-list or otherwise? The process of getting PNI in place with other CSPs was straightforward, but I haven't heard back from AWS after a month and several follow-ups. Our customers would really benefit from us getting this sorted. 

There are many folks that here that are in AWS. Assuming you have followed what is in https://aws.amazon.com/peering/ (and https://aws.amazon.com/peering/policy/ ) then send me details privately about what/when/who and I'll reach out internally to the relevant folks. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220204/3a885f91/attachment.html>