[anti-abuse-wg] Yet another BGP hijacking towards AS16509

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Tue Aug 23 02:03:19 UTC 2022

In message <CAO3CAMoT9gC_Evd-CcZg06A-o_MajmLtxLHbXFnauDoMyqoSYg at mail.gmail.com>, 
Siyuan Miao <siyuan at misaka.io> wrote:

>Hjacking didn't last too long. AWS started announcing a more specific
>announcement to prevent hijacking around 3 hours later. Kudos to Amazon's
>security team :-)

Sorry.  I'm missing something here.  If the hijack was of, then
how did AWS propagate a "more specific" than that?


More information about the NANOG mailing list