NANOG List posts and DMARC
johnl at iecc.com
Tue Aug 2 20:31:46 UTC 2022
It appears that Michael Thomas via NANOG <mike at mtcc.com> said:
>On 8/2/22 12:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via NANOG wrote:
>> It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter
>> being Jared's situation)
I don't understand Jared's concern. His DMARC policy, like mine, is p=none
which tells receivers to do nothing DMARC-y with our messages. I don't get
any sort of blowback from nanog posts that I can recall seeing.
>I'm sort of surprised that an org would have p=reject when its users use
>outside mailing lists.
Unfortunately, we lost that battle a long time ago. It's "more secure" and
"best practice" so go away.
More information about the NANOG