Gmail (thus Nanog) rejecting ipv6 email
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Sat Apr 2 23:21:09 UTC 2022
On 4/2/22 4:05 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On 2 Apr 2022, at 6:23 PM, Jeroen Massar via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org>
> wrote:
>> There are a lot of bits and bobs that one has to get right for mail
>> to flow, amongst which:
>>
>> - IP -> PTR lookup -> that hostname lookup, and match to IP again
>> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-confirmed_reverse_DNS)
>> - SPF
>> - DKIM
>> - DMARC
>> - ARC (for mailinglists)
>> - SRS (When forwarding, rewrite the From and resign DKIM, and then
>> ARC-sign that)
>> - Decent TLS
>> - MTA-STS
>
> Jeroen -
>
> It is indeed amazing how many protocols we can spin up to address
> the same underlying problem, time and time again...
>
> If anyone can anonymously join the mail-sending club and send some
> email [until bad reputation precludes such], and achieving bad
> reputation results has no real-world implications, and a new
> network persona (e.g. domain name) is always available, then the
> problem could be considered intractable by initial conditions –
> and no amount of anti-spam protocols (no matter how brilliantly
> designed and engineered) should be expected to durably address the
> problem.
>
> (It might, however, be interesting to do a regression analysis on
> the spam mitigation protocol introduction dates – it’d be
> interesting to know if the expected number protocols that will
> need proper setup in 10, 20, 40 years…!)
>
>
That's why I wrote this:
https://rip-van-webble.blogspot.com/2020/12/are-mailing-lists-toast.html
Trust me, it wasn't for lack of trying on my part.
Mike
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20220402/13fefe84/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list