[External] Re: uPRF strict more

Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
Thu Sep 30 23:51:31 UTC 2021


On Thu, 30 Sep 2021 18:12:51 +0200, Mark Tinka said:

> I should have said "If you don't plan to run a full BGP table on a
> device without a default a route as well,

Am I insufficently caffienated, or is uRPF the least of your problems
if you don't have a full table *and* don't have a default route?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 494 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210930/705ddab2/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list