uPRF strict more

Wed Sep 29 01:06:57 UTC 2021

Randy, great question. I'm teaching that it's very rarely, if ever,
used (due to high potential for benign loss); it's always great to be
either confirmed or corrected...

So if anyone replies just to Randy - pls cc me too (or, Randy, if you could
sum up and send to list or me - thanks!)

Amir
-- 
Amir Herzberg

Comcast professor of Security Innovations, Computer Science and
Engineering, University of Connecticut
Homepage: https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/home
`Applied Introduction to Cryptography' textbook and lectures:
 https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/applied-crypto-textbook
<https://sites.google.com/site/amirherzberg/applied-crypto-textbook>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 8:50 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> do folk use uPRF strict mode?  i always worried about the multi-homed
> customer sending packets out the other way which loop back to me;  see
> RFC 8704 §2.2
>
> do vendors implement the complexity of 8704; and, if so, do operators
> use it?
>
> clue bat please
>
> randy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210928/f46aba1d/attachment.html>