Fiber Network Equipment Commercial Norms

Brandon Svec bsvec at teamonesolutions.com
Wed Sep 22 17:51:39 UTC 2021


Everything is negotiable.  The building owner/representative can negotiate
with the telco any terms they wish.


On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 9:30 AM <jray06 at gmail.com> wrote:

> A few of the buildings that my firm represents have the local telco’s
> fiber distribution and/or repeater equipment located on the premises. My
> understanding is that when one of these links go down, (we’ve occasionally
> had to interrupt circuit power to do maintenance in a building for one
> reason or another), a local engineering tech always comes running to
> restore the link. The tech has led our maintenance staff to believe that
> these repeaters are an integral part of the local ring, which fits my
> understanding.
>
>
>
> When a network operator has equipment located at a third party premises,
> what is the norm for commercial contractual terms regarding the siting of
> that equipment? Any network equipment on site pre-dates my client’s
> ownership of the buildings, and they have no record of any agreements or
> easements governing who is responsible for power, maintenance, liability,
> etc.
>
>
>
> My client has no philosophical objection to having the equipment on site,
> but he’s asked why he has had to pay to power and cool this equipment for
> almost 20 years when it serves him no benefit (he is not utilizing that
> company’s services). I figure some of you may be able to give me an insight
> as to what is normal and reasonable. Feel free to contact me directly if
> this message is not suitable for this distribution list.
>
>
>
> Appreciate the insight,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Jeff Ray*
>
> O:  (956) 542-3642
>
> C:  (956) 592-2019
>
> JRay06 at gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> This message has been sent as a part of a discussion between Jeff Ray and
> the intended recipient identified above. Some topics may be sensitive and
> subject to legal privilege, confidentiality, or other non-disclosure
> agreement. Should you receive this message by mistake, we would be most
> grateful if you informed us that the message has been sent to you. In that
> case, we also ask that you delete this message from your mailbox, and do
> not forward or speak of it (or its contents) to anyone else. Thank you for
> your cooperation and understanding.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210922/9a399b3b/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list