IPv6 woes - RFC

Masataka Ohta mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Thu Sep 16 15:15:50 UTC 2021


Baldur Norddahl wrote:

 >>>>>> But in fact with local number portability, you cannot rely
 >>>                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 >>> You are confusing number portability and call forwarding

 > I am not confusing anything. Nobody said anything about number
 > portability in the above quote.

But, Shane Ronan wrote:

 > But in fact with local number portability, you cannot rely on the
 > county code to tell you where to route a telephone call anymore.
 > Which is many calls result in a data dip to provide you the routing
 > information from a central repository.

OK?

 > Just pointing out that some assumptions about how voice call works is
 > not true. Nor would it be smart to send traffic to another part of
 > the world unnecessarily. Local calls stay local even when roaming.
 > Please remember that signaling and voice is separate in the telco
 > world which is why it compares poorly with IP. Except for the LISP
 > protocol which does something similar.

I'm afraid you have too much complicated view on phone networks
and the Internet.

							Masataka Ohta


More information about the NANOG mailing list