IPv6 woes - RFC
Nick Hilliard
nick at foobar.org
Mon Sep 13 21:26:57 UTC 2021
Randy Bush wrote on 13/09/2021 19:22:
> the specs as originally RFCed by the ietf is very telling. for your
> amusement, take a look at rfc 2450. it took five years of war to get
> rid of the tla/sla crap. and look at the /64 religion today[0].
architectural decisions were made because of a mixture of actual and
perceived problems at the time, but several of the outcomes make little
sense now or in some cases, actively cause problems. E.g. using mcast
for address resolution because large flat l2 networks were the order of
the day, that "privacy addresses" would give privacy, that client
self-selected addresses should be the only game in town for
auto-addressing (it took years to get any form of dhcp through), that
extension headers were a great idea, that "transition mechanisms" would
be viable for fundamentally incompatible protocols, etc. That said,
it's easy to be critical of design decisions with 25y of hindsight, and
even easier to understate how difficult it is to dislodge ipv4 which
took 40 years of evolution to cement itself into its current position.
Nick
More information about the NANOG
mailing list