IPv6 woes - RFC

Fri Sep 10 00:08:44 UTC 2021

Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:

>>> The reality is that if we get content dual-stacked and stop requiring IPv4
>>> for new eyeball installations, that’s the biggest initial win.

> This is my point… That is why I think an announcement of “On X date,
> we will begin charging extra for IPv4 services and define Internet Access
> to be IPv6” by a couple of the larger eyeball ISPs would light a pretty
> big fire under those laggards.

Aren't you calling your desire "the reality"?

							Masataka Ohta