PCH Peering Survey 2021

Denis Fondras xxnog at ledeuns.net
Fri Oct 29 16:55:23 UTC 2021

Le Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Bill Woodcock a écrit :
> If you’re peering with an MLPA route-server, you’re welcome to include just
> the route-server’s ASN, if that’s easiest, rather than trying to include each
> of the peer ASNs on the other side of the route-server. Either way is fine.

I have an agreement with the RS owner (IXP) but not with each participant.
Should the contractual relationship be true or false ?

More information about the NANOG mailing list