IPv6 and CDN's
Fred Baker
fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 01:46:02 UTC 2021
Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
> On Oct 23, 2021, at 1:55 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 23, 2021, 15:17 Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think you will find that there are some places in which getting IPv6 network service has been difficult, and as a result even IPv6-
>
>
> Fred, do you mean places like, all of Verizon FiOS?
That would be an example. If I traceroute to an ipv6 address, the fact that I get a response is proof that the path works. F root has some servers for which, MOU be damned, there is no working IPv6 path. Mumble…
>> capable equipment is not reachable by IPv6. Those are, however, few and far between.
>>
>> Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...
>>
>> > On Oct 23, 2021, at 6:04 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > So, in theory, all the root servers should be available via IPv6 and, as far as I can tell, they are.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211023/bda453b8/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list