IPv6 woes - RFC
Victor Kuarsingh
victor at jvknet.com
Fri Oct 1 02:35:20 UTC 2021
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:01 PM Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu>
wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:09:26 -0400, Victor Kuarsingh said:
>
> > - Both providers provide IPv6 and delegate a prefix to the router (let's
> > pretend the retail staff knew enough to sell this person a consumer box
> > with 2x WAN interfaces)
>
Just to make it clear, I would love it all to work really well and by
default. But I also look at the reality and don't over estimate how
proficient consumers will be.
>
> So... do such boxes exist in any great quantity?
>
Not in great quantity. But for the fun of it, I ran down to the local
BestBuy recently and they offered me a dual WAN router (only one type) in
stock. So, I guess sufficient supply?
>
> Do consumers who can't add a valid number after 'IPv' accidentally
> contract for
> Internet service from two different providers often? Do they intentionally
> do
> that often?
>
Likely not accidentally, but the router they showed me (will not say what
brand on this list) showed a "WAN" and "WAN/DMZ" port, so just as clear as
any other port markings for consumer grade connections.
>
> It sounds like a sufficiently rare situation that "clueless lawyer/whatever
> hires somebody with clue for 2 hours work to configure it all" is a
> reasonable
> solution.
>
Yes, I suspect that may happen. How many clueful IPv6 folks do we suspect
service this market which are available at a cost most will be willing to
pay?
regards,
Victor K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210930/c27cf00f/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list