Quantifying the customer support and impact of cgnat for residential ipv4
aaron1 at gvtc.com
aaron1 at gvtc.com
Mon Nov 22 04:10:02 UTC 2021
I have >50,000 subscribers behind CGNat. I would have to find out from the assigners group, the rate at which static/public IP address sales increased during our CGNat deployment over the last few years. I do understand that we had an up-tick in public IP sales, but unsure of the rate at which it occurred… actually I may have to get in contact with the sales group for a question like that.
About problems (BTW, we use Juniper MX platform with service mic/mpc) … we had some significant issues initially… but things like…
* Tuning the IGP to route to the closest CGNat boundary node, consistently
* AMS interface source-ip load balancing
* APP
* EIM
* EIF
…help greatly in fixing issue with authentication on websites (webmail, banking) and also, vpn issues, and issues with gaming consoles, were largely resolved with those aforementioned enhancements
-Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211121/52b5425b/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list