Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Sat Nov 20 21:38:40 UTC 2021
> On Nov 19, 2021, at 12:11 , Jim <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:24 PM David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>>
> ...
>> Some (not me) might argue it could (further) hamper IPv6 deployment by diverting limited resources.
>
> It may help IPv6 deployment if more V4 addresses are eventually
> released and allocated
> Assuming the RIRs would ultimately like to provision the usage of
> addresses within their own policies
> that the new address releases are exclusively for 'IPv6 Transition
> Tech.', such as CGN NAT addresses,
CGN NAT is NOT a transition technology.
DS-LITE is an example of a transition technology
CGN-NAT is an example of an avoidance of transition technology.
Owen
More information about the NANOG
mailing list