Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Sat Nov 20 14:35:48 UTC 2021

Mans Nilsson wrote:

Supplying context you omit:

 >>> No, it is the real reason that we still have v4 around.

 >> Even more than 25 years after IPv6 became a proposed standard?
>> It merely means IPv6 is not deployable with the real reason.

 > IPv6 is deployable. It is deployed.

If you mean ATM is deployable and was deployed, yes, you are
right. So?

 >> After finding that, I, as a theorist, totally abandoned IPv6.
 > You gave up, based on false conclusions.

Sorry, but I'm not interested in how you falsely recognize the
real world of practical and theoretical internetworking.

						Masataka Ohta