Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 8:35 AM Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog at nanog.org> wrote:
> I’m all for IPv6 having better implementations than IPv4 rather than mere feature parity.

Me too, just not in a dystopian Harrison Bergeron sort of way.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]