Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Thu Nov 18 18:13:40 UTC 2021
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Keller" <justincompsci at gmail.com>
> I'd be fine if newish devices use it like a 1918 but I don't think
> it's worth the headache and difficulty of making it globally routed.
> Maybe Amazon could use it too
I could be wrong, but I don't think expanding 1918 was the goal of these
proponents....
Cheers,
-- jra
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
>>
>> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
>> me. So many things are just me.
>>
>> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- jra
>>
>> --
>> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
>> Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
>> Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info
> > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274
More information about the NANOG
mailing list