Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
Joe Maimon
jmaimon at jmaimon.com
Thu Nov 18 17:47:16 UTC 2021
Jonathan Kalbfeld via NANOG wrote:
> How much runway would a single /8 give us?
Up to 65280 /24's becoming available through registrars would be quite
welcome to lots of small organizations or startups.
> Is it worth the headache to gain a single /8 ?
I support serious consideration be given to determine the extent of the
headache and to answer that question.
>
> If we’re going to do something that Majorly Breaks the Internet(tm),
> why not talk about the 240/4 space instead?
I think 240/4 is indeed a very good idea deserving of proper
consideration. That does not mean that other ideas arent worthy as well.
But at this point 240/4 is practically a no brainer.
>
> <economics>We can’t fight address exhaustion on the supply side. The
> only way to fix IPv4 exhaustion is by shifting the demand curve inward
> and that is through IPV6 and aggressive reclamation of IPv4
> space.<economics />
>
> Jonathan
>
> Jonathan Kalbfeld
>
> office: +1 310 317 7933 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7933>
> fax: +1 310 317 7901 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7901>
> home: +1 310 317 7909 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7909>
> mobile: +1 310 227 1662 <tel:%28310%29%20227-1662>
>
> ThoughtWave Technologies, Inc.
> Studio City, CA 91604
> https://thoughtwave.com
>
> View our network at
> https://bgp.he.net/AS54380
>
> +1 213 984 1000
>
>> On Nov 17, 2021, at 3:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com
>> <mailto:jra at baylink.com>> wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who
>> noticed?
>>
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
>>
>> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe
>> it's just
>> me. So many things are just me.
>>
>> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -- jra
>>
>> --
>> Jay R. Ashworth Baylink
>> jra at baylink.com
>> Designer The Things I Think
>> RFC 2100
>> Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info
>> St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727
>> 647 1274
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list