Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Thu Nov 18 16:53:53 UTC 2021

How much runway would a single /8 give us?  Is it worth the headache to gain a single /8 ?

If we’re going to do something that Majorly Breaks the Internet(tm), why not talk about the 240/4 space instead?  

<economics>We can’t fight address exhaustion on the supply side.  The only way to fix IPv4 exhaustion is by shifting the demand curve inward and that is through IPV6 and aggressive reclamation of IPv4 space.<economics />

Jonathan

Jonathan Kalbfeld

office: +1 310 317 7933 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7933>
fax:    +1 310 317 7901 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7901>
home:   +1 310 317 7909 <tel:%28310%29%20317-7909>
mobile: +1 310 227 1662 <tel:%28310%29%20227-1662>

ThoughtWave Technologies, Inc.
Studio City, CA 91604
https://thoughtwave.com <https://thoughtwave.com/>

View our network at 
https://bgp.he.net/AS54380 <https://bgp.he.net/AS54380>

+1 213 984 1000

> On Nov 17, 2021, at 3:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> 
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
> 
> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
> me.  So many things are just me.
> 
> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
> 
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> 
> -- 
> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
> Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          
> St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20211118/6416052a/attachment.html>