Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2021-11-18, at 00:29, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> 
> This seems like a really bad idea

Right up there with the FUSSP.

https://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html

Someone should write a page like that about the FUSIAS (final ultimate solution to the IPv4 address shortage) proposals.

Grüße, Carsten

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]