Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It’s being discussed on Hacker News.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29246420

> On Nov 17, 2021, at 3:29 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> 
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
> 
> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
> me.  So many things are just me.
> 
> [ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]
> 
> Cheers,
> -- jra
> 
> -- 
> Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
> Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
> Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          
> St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

• Previous message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]