Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

Thu Nov 18 04:54:10 UTC 2021

On 11/18/21 01:29, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:

> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html
>
> That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
> me.  So many things are just me.

There is a better chance of writing a successful RFC to clean up "cisco, 
cisco" for user/pass on Google.

Mark.