Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public

• Previous message (by thread): Reminder to Submit Presentations for NANOG 84
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who noticed?

https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast-127-00.html

That's over a week old and I don't see 3000 comments on it, so maybe it's just
me.  So many things are just me.

[ Hat tip to Lauren Weinstein, whom I stole it from ]

Cheers,
-- jra

-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra at baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274

• Previous message (by thread): Reminder to Submit Presentations for NANOG 84
• Next message (by thread): Redploying most of 127/8 as unicast public
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]