Juniper hardware recommendation
Colton Conor
colton.conor at gmail.com
Sun May 16 12:56:02 UTC 2021
Looks like its replacement is the 5120 series. The question is does the
5120 have the same limitations and similar chipset?
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 7:06 AM Jason Healy <jhealy at suffieldacademy.org>
wrote:
> To echo Alain's comments earlier, the Juniper QFX 5100 series is stable,
> once you figure out all the shortcomings of the chipset. We aren't doing
> anything fancy, but have certainly bumped into our share of issues that
> have no workaround because it's a limitation of the physical hardware.
> Since we're talking about counters, see if you can spot the error with IPv6
> accounting in the output from our 5100 below (about 50% of our traffic is
> v6):
>
> Transit statistics:
> Input bytes : 284315487788005 412457312 bps
> Output bytes : 39937401090441 29417528 bps
> Input packets: 231391925059 39552 pps
> Output packets: 88278182551 10809 pps
> IPv6 transit statistics:
> Input bytes : 0
> Output bytes : 0
> Input packets: 0
> Output packets: 0
>
>
> ;-)
>
> I believe the 5100 just announced EOL (
> https://support.juniper.net/support/eol/product/qfx_series/); I haven't
> had time to look at the replacement models to see if they behave any better.
>
> Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210516/b89e8fe9/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list