Juniper hardware recommendation
Mark Tinka
mark at tinka.africa
Mon May 10 14:25:21 UTC 2021
On 5/10/21 16:19, aaron1 at gvtc.com wrote:
> I prefer MX204 over the ACX5048. The ACX5048 can’t add L3 interface
> to an mpls layer 2 type of service. There are other limitations to
> the ACX5048 that cause me to want to possibly replace them with
> MX204’s. But in defense of the ACX5048, we have gotten some good
> mileage (a few years now) of good resi/busi bb over vrf’s and also
> carrier ethernet for businesses and lots of cell backhaul… so they are
> good for that. I’ve heard the ACX5448 was even better.
>
Trio will always provide better features, but come with the price tag to
boot.
> I’m looking at the MX240 for the SCB3E MPC10E hefty with 100 gig ports
>
You might want to look at the MX10003, in that case, as well. We are
deploying those for 100Gbps service (customer-facing). Works out cheaper
than offering 100Gbps service on the MX240/480/960 for the same task.
Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210510/abc4ea45/attachment.html>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list