Best practice for ptp/loopback numbering for "small" enterprise multihome setup

Tom Beecher beecher at beecher.cc
Fri Mar 26 19:10:02 UTC 2021


>
> i take real addresses out of the /24 for p2p
> i take 1918 addresses for ibgp loopbacks
>

This.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:22 PM Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > tl;dr - If I only have a /24 PI - is there any way to use this and not
> > “chop it up / deagg” to use for ptp/loopbacks ?
>
> i take real addresses out of the /24 for p2p
> i take 1918 addresses for ibgp loopbacks
>
> randy
>
> ---
> randy at psg.com
> `gpg --locate-external-keys --auto-key-locate wkd randy at psg.com`
> signatures are back, thanks to dmarc header butchery
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210326/183d06c4/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list