Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
Grant Taylor
gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net
Mon Mar 22 22:21:19 UTC 2021
My interpretation of Scott's message was "what's happening to the
existing archived content?".
On 3/22/21 4:08 PM, David Siegel wrote:
> We are not anticipating any material impacts to any subscribers, whether
> real people or list archivers.
Does that mean that the existing archives will both receive new messages
and will the existing old content still be accessible?
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4013 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20210322/a4801f19/attachment.bin>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list